FIND ME ON

GitHub

LinkedIn

Four Hypotheses

🌱

Definition
StochasticControl

(c.1)(c.1) (“Compactness” of Action constraint set)

Each action constraint set SiS^{i} (iNi\in\mathcal{N}) is a closed and bounded subset of the action space Ui\mathbb{U}^{i} (iNi\in\mathcal{N}) which is itself a finite dimensional vector space. ### (c.2)(c.2) (Lower semicontinuity of LL) L(ξ,u1,,uN)L(\xi,u^{1},\dots,u^{N}) is a.s. jointly lsc in (u1,,uN)=:u(u^{1},\dots,u^{N})=:\mathbf{u} on U:=U1××UN\mathbf{U}:=\mathbb{U}^{1}\times\dots \times \mathbb{U}^{N}; ### (c.3)(c.3) (Measurement set is finite + each measurement has positive probability) Each measurement set Yi,iN\mathbb{Y}^{i},i\in\mathcal{N} is finite, with no element receiving zero probability from the probability measure PP; or equivalently, for each iNi\in\mathcal{N}, the partition set Yi\mathbf{Y}^{i} has a finite number of elements, with each element receiving positive probability from PP; ### (c.4)(c.4) (LL has a minimum and LL is integrable) L(ξ,u1,,uN)L(\xi,u^{1},\dots,u^{N}) is bounded from below, and Eξyi[L(ξ;u1,,uN)]E_{\xi|y^{i}}[L(\xi;u^{1},\dots,u^{N})] is finite for every yiYi,ujUj,i,jNy^{i}\in\mathbb{Y}^{i},u^{j}\in\mathbb{U}^{j},i,j\in\mathcal{N}.

Remark

Note that under finite spaces (c.1)(c.1) implies our policy space Γ\mathbf{\Gamma} is compact which already gives us half of the Weierstrass Theorem.

Linked from