Let (Xt)t≥0,(Yt)t≥0 be stochastic processes on (Ω,F,P). Our goal is to make sense of ∫YdX ## 1. Lebesgue-Stieltjes Pathwise Integral We first tried to use the LS integral to do this. We first noted that the Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measure, μg only worked with gincreasing and that μg was the difference between two increasing functions.
We then saw that for any g=g1−g2 where both g1,g2 are increasing that g then must have Variation on R+.
To summarize, if we wished to use the LS integral to define ∫YdX we needed X to be a continuousmartingale with Variation but this form meant that X was constant which is pretty useless!
We then thought, ok how about RS integrals? i.e. ∀ω∈Ω∣π∣→0limi=0∑N−1Yti(ω)(Xti+1(ω)−Xti(ω))where π=(t0,…,tN) is a subdivision of [0,1] (for simplicity). We then defined the following: Let g:[0,1]→R be continuous. Define Sπ∈C0([0,1]:R) to be Sπ(f)=i=0∑N−1f(ti)(g(ti+1)−g(ti))Assume lim∣π∣→0Sπ(f) exists ∀f∈C0([0,1]:R). We then applied the Principle of Uniform Boundedness to find that g also needs to have Variation on [0,1] in order for this to be defined i.e. ∥Sπ∥op=∥f∥∞≤1sup∣Sπ(f)∣=V(g;π)and by the theorem we found that n∈Nsup∥Sπ∥op=n∈NsupV(g;π)<∞ Then considering the standard Brownian Motion(Bt)t≥0 we computed 0∫tBsdBs=21(Bt2−t)in probability by applying the framework of the RS integral.
Motivation Trying Again!
Let now (Mt)t≥0 be a right continuousL2-martingale and (Xt)t≥0 be a stochastic process on (Ω,F,P). Our goal is to make sense of ∫XdMin a way that it agrees with the LS pathwise integrals whenever they’re defined. ## Itô Isometry (0) Now, we take g increasing and right continuous meaning we can redefine the Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measureμg strictly on intervals of the type (a,b] i.e. since g right continuous ⟹g(b+)=g(b) and g(a+)=g(a) Hence μg((a,b])=g(b)−g(a) Hence for 0≤s<t we define ∫1(s,t]×ΩdM=Mt−MsLetting F⊂Ω we then consider 1(s,t]×F{1(s,t]0ω∈FotherwiseGiving us ∫1(s,t]×FdM=1F(Mt−Ms) ## Itô Isometry (1) Let now (Mt)t≥0 be a right continuousL2-martingale. We denote μM as the Doléans measure on (R+×Ω,P) associated with M. where P is the σ-algebra generated byR. Now let F∈FsE[(∫1(s,t]×FdM)2]=E[1F(Mt−Ms)2]=μM((s,t]×F)E[1F(Mt2−Ms2)]which is our first version of the isometry. More formally: ∀0≤s<t,∀F∈FsE[(Itoˆ Stochastic Integral∫1(s,t]×FdM)2]=μM((s,t]×F)=Lebesgue IntegralR+×Ω∫1(s,t]×FdμMWhich we can think of as a bridge from our Itô Stochastic Integral to the Lebesgue Integral or Lebesgue-Stieltjes Integral. ### Note For 0≤s<t,F∈FsE[(∫1(s,t]×FdM)2]=E[1F(Mt2−Ms2)]≥0and for F∈F0∫1{0}×FdM=0μM({0}×F)=0 ## Itô Isometry (2) We then introduce some sets/σ-algebras: - R: (R) Set of Predictable Rectangles - A: (A) Ring Generated by R - P: (P) Predictable σ-algebra We then define E to be the set of set of simple predictable processes where any X∈E can be represented like so: X=i=1∑nai1(si,ti]×Fi+k=1∑ndk1{0}×F0k(★)where 0≤si<ti,Fi∈Fsi,∀i=1,…,n and F0k∈F0,∀k=1,…,n. We then use this to define the new isometry: Let M=(Mt)t≥0 be a right continuousL2-martingale. We have that the isometry holds ∀X∈E where E[(∫XdM)2]=R+×Ω∫X2dμMor ∫XdML2(Ω,F,P)=∥X∥L2(R+×Ω,P,μm) ## Itô Isometry (3) Now we extend the previous isometry by proving the Density of Ɛ in L2(R+×Ω,P,μM). This allows us to get to our final destination.
Let M=(Mt)t≥0 be a right continuousL2-martingale. We have that the isometry holds ∀X∈L2(R+×Ω,P,μM) where E[(∫XdM)2]=R+×Ω∫X2dμMor ∫XdML2(Ω,F,P)=∥X∥L2(R+×Ω,P,μm)